The Great Australia Dream of owning a home is still alive. But it's becoming increasingly challenging to get.
Australia’s homeownership rate sits at 62.7%, close to the OECD average, yet the traditional dream of owning property is becoming harder to reach and more costly to maintain.
“For most of the twentieth century, homeownership was a social contract available to most in the form of affordable land, accessible credit, a pathway achievable within a reasonable working life,” said Ray White Group economist Atom Go Tian.
That contract has frayed as prices surged and borrowing rules tightened.
“As house prices have climbed, the path from renter to mortgaged owner to outright owner has elongated dramatically,” Go Tian said.
The pressure is evident in mortgage stress data. Roy Morgan estimates that 23.9% of mortgage holders are now “at risk”, with 15% “extremely at risk.”
Yet by global standards, Australia still sits in a “homeownership dream” cluster alongside New Zealand, Canada, the UK, and the US – nations where owning remains central to housing security, even as the model strains.
Western Europe offers a striking contrast. Go Tian points to countries such as Switzerland, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany, which “build their housing systems around renting as a legitimate, long-term stable life choice, not a way station to buying,” backed by strong tenant protections and professionally managed rental stock. Switzerland’s 61.1% rental rate and Germany’s 55.4% highlight how deeply embedded long‑term renting is in those markets.
Japan represents a radical alternative, where homes are treated as depreciating assets.
“Because houses depreciate rather than appreciate, Japan builds continuously,” Go Tian said, noting that Tokyo issues more housing permits each year than the entire state of California, yet rents have stayed flat for decades.
The US shows how mortgage design shapes outcomes. Its 30‑year fixed‑rate loans allow borrowers to lock in repayments for the life of the loan, steadily converting debt to equity.
By contrast, Australia’s variable‑rate culture means every cash rate move flows quickly through to most borrowers, encouraging equity extraction in low‑rate periods rather than rapid paydown.
Canada and New Zealand most closely mirror Australia’s settings: high reliance on mortgage debt, limited social housing, and a private rental sector that expanded “by default” rather than by design. Demand‑side levers such as first‑home buyer grants and Help‑to‑Buy schemes can temporarily boost access, but Go Tian warns they often inflate prices and “undermine their own goals” by favouring existing owners.
“The single most transferable lesson from the OECD data is that countries with functioning housing systems, whether ownership-based like the US or rental-based like Germany, built them through deliberate, tenure-neutral policy sustained over time,” he said.
“The Australian Dream is not dead. But it has been quietly privatised,” leaving households – and the brokers who advise them – to navigate a system where housing security depends more than ever on careful debt management and product choice.
Get the hottest and freshest property and mortgage news delivered right into your inbox. Subscribe now to our FREE daily newsletter.
